Head-to-head · same test room

Pedra vs Roomagen

Both tools staged the same empty room with default settings; only the first output counts. Verdict first, then every number we have.

Last updated · prices checked 19 October 2026

Partial results. As of 21 October 2026 we have scored room 01 of 10 for 8 tools (tested 19 October 2026), plus a few extra rooms for some. The other 12 of the 20 tools we list are not tested yet. No final ranking. How we test

Verdict

Roomagen kept the room closer to the original on room 01: architecture drift 15.3 vs 27.1 (lower is better). On published prices Pedra is cheaper per staged photo: $0.33 vs $0.40 on the cheapest paid option.

Pick Pedra if…
  • cost per photo decides it: $0.33 vs $0.40 on the cheapest paid option (Pro Monthly, €29/month).
  • you want to try it before creating an account (Yes).
  • you need 360 or video output: listed on Pedra's pages, not listed or not verified for Roomagen.
Pick Roomagen if…
  • walls, windows and doors must stay as they are: lower room 01 drift (15.3 vs 27.1).
  • the delivered photo must keep your exact camera frame: it passed our framing check; Pedra failed it (zoom 0.9871; 2.5% of the output is outside the original frame).
  • the furniture has to look real: higher editor realism rating on room 01 (4.2 vs 3.8 of 5, one editor, not blind).
  • you need restyling a furnished room and day-to-dusk: listed on Roomagen's pages, not listed or not verified for Pedra.

Built from the numbers below, not a paid placement. This is not a final ranking.

Pedra vs Roomagen, side by side
Room rows are our own tests; prices, plans and features from public pages checked 2026-10-19. ✓ yes · ✕ no · ? not verified.
Partial · 1 of 10 rooms
MetricPedraRoomagen
TypeAIAI
Tested by StagingBenchRoom 01 plus 5 more rooms (6 of 10)Room 01 plus 1 more room (2 of 10)
Room 01 architecture drift (lower = better)27.115.3
Room 01 framingFailPass
Room 01 time to result~35 s~45 s
Watermark on our free outputYes (badge)Yes (heavy tiled + badge)
Free output size (original 1280x960)2048x15362400x1792
Editor realism, room 01 (1-5)3.84.2
Cheapest paid optionPro Monthly, €29/monthStarter, $12/month
Price per photo, cheapest option$0.33 (€0.29)$0.40
Next tier300 credits/month (EUR 75) · $0.28/photoPro ($29/mo, 100 images) · $0.29/photo
Free tier (vendor page)7 image credits + 1 video + 1 virtual tour at signup, no card (our account got 6); free no-signup tool on pedra.ai/free-tools6 one-time credits (3 images), watermarked; '2K on your first edit, then 1K'
Try without an accountYesNo
Turnaroundnot statedUsually under a minute (vendor claim)
Refund policy (vendor)not statedFailed generations refunded automatically; full refund within 30 days of first purchase or 7 days of a renewal
Redo / revisions (vendor)Thumbs-down a bad result and you may get the credit backDefective results reviewed case by case via support
Max resolution (vendor)2048 px (Large) on our free downloadFree: 2K first edit then 1K; Starter 'HD'; Pro/Business 'Ultra HD' (pixel sizes not stated)
Room 02 architecture drift26.6 · framing pass34.6 · framing pass
Declutter / remove furniture✓✓
Empty-room staging✓✓
Restyle a furnished room?✓
Day to dusk?✓
Sky replacement✓✓
Renovation / wall & floor recolor✓✓
360 or video✓?
API✓✓
"Virtually staged" disclaimer option??
Commercial-use licence stated??

Room 01: original vs staged

Same empty open-plan room, default settings, first output only. Each image shows the original next to the aligned output.

What we noted

Pedra

Room 01: Framing fails: zoomed out by about 1.3% and rotated about 0.5°, so roughly 2.5% of the image at the edges is newly drawn. After alignment the walls, column and doorway line up, but parts of the kitchen are redrawn and wall decor adds edges, so architecture drift stays high (27.1). Alignment explains about 10 of the 37.6 raw points.

Editor notes: Separate living and dining zones suit the open-plan room. The sectional is large but believable; it stands in front of the column. Adds fixtures that aren't in the flat: a pendant lamp over a new dining table and under-cabinet kitchen lights.

Pricing notes: Annual: EUR 239/yr for 1,200 credits (about EUR 0.20/photo). The page's own table rounds 100 credits to EUR 0.28/credit. 1 credit per staged photo.

Sources: pedra.ai/pricing (checked 2026-10-19); our own test log (2026-10-19)

Roomagen

Room 01: Kept the frame, low drift. The heavy tiled watermark makes the free output hard to use in a listing. Time is approximate (30–57 s observed).

Editor notes: Living zone staged, kitchen left alone. Sizes are right, but a console table and lamp sit across the passage behind the column. No melted or floating objects; the heavy hexagon watermark covers everything.

Pricing notes: Our observation: room 01 at 2K gave 2400x1792; room 02 at the same 2K setting gave only 1200x896, matching the page's 'then 1K'. The account showed 4 credits after verification (6 advertised) and one 2-credit run took it to 0, so 2 credits are unaccounted for. 60 credits; every tool costs 2 credits.

Sources: roomagen.com/pricing (checked 2026-10-19); our own test log (2026-10-19)

Rooms both tools staged

Architecture drift runs from 0 to 100, lower is better (how much walls, windows and doors changed after aligning the output to the original). Differences of about 3 points or less are within measurement noise. Framing fails if the tool cropped, zoomed, shifted or rotated the photo beyond our thresholds. Editor realism ratings are one person's 1-5 ratings, not blind. Details: methodology. Partial results: 1 of 10 rooms scored for most tools (Collov AI also has rooms 02-05, Pedra rooms 02-06 and Roomagen room 02. The leaderboard still compares room 01 only.). Prices from vendors' public pages, checked 19 October 2026; EUR converted at the ECB rate (1.1253, 2026-10-16). Nobody paid for a placement, and affiliate links never change the order.

Related pages